Raptor 650 (2001 - 2003) review
An entertaining ride that is let down by inferior build quality
Using Suzuki’s SV motor, it comes as no surprise that the 650I.E is pretty bloody good. The chassis shares similarities too, but where the Suzuki uses budget parts, the Cagiva boasts inverted forks and Brembo brakes.
It might sound like a tastier proposition than the Suzuki but be warned – the build quality isn’t on a par with the Japanese machine and will need plenty of TLC to keep it looking mint.
Using Suzuki’s SV motor, it comes as no surprise that the 650I.E is pretty bloody good. The chassis shares similarities too, but where the Suzuki uses budget parts, the Cagiva boasts inverted forks and Brembo brakes.
It might sound like a tastier proposition than the Suzuki but be warned – the build quality isn’t on a par with the Japanese machine and will need plenty of TLC to keep it looking mint.
| Length (mm) | 2109 |
| Width (mm) | 800 |
| Height (mm) | 1089 |
| Dryweight (kg) | 180 |
| Seats | 0 |
| Seat Height (mm) | 775 |
| Suspension Front | Upside-down telescopic hydraulic (Ø 43mm) |
| Suspension Rear | Progressive with hydraulic single |
| Wheels Front | 3,50"x17" |
| Wheels Rear | 4,50"x17" |
| Wheels Made Of | Light alloy |
| Tyres Front | 120/70-17 |
| Tyres Rear | 160/60-17 |
| Brakes Front | Twin disc brake Ø 298mm |
| Brakes Rear | Disc brake Ø 220mm |
| Tank Capacity (litres) | 19 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 1438 |
| Ground Clearance (mm) | 165 |
| Trail (mm) | 108 |
| Chassis | High strength steel tubolar frame |
| Cubic Capacity (cc) | 645 |
| Max Power (bhp) | 72 |
| Max Power Peak (rpm) | 9000 |
| Torque (ft/lb) | 47 |
| Torque Peak (rpm) | 7400 |
| Bore (mm) | 81 |
| Stroke (mm) | 62.6 |
| Valve Gear | DOHC |
| Compression Ratio | 11.5 |
| Ignition | Electronic |
| Cooling | Liquid cooled |
| Fuel Delivery | Twin carburettors |
| Stroke Type | Four Stroke |
| Drive | Chain |
